Dave, Thanks for this. One suggested change:
On 3/25/09 10:10 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > "Old" refers to the Errata I-D; "New" is the proffered replacement. > > > > > 8. RFC4871 Section 2.11 Identity Assessor > > Old: > The name of the module that consumes DKIM's primary payload, the > responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). It can optionally > consume the Agent or User Identifier (AUID) value, if provided to > the module. > > New: > The name of the module that consumes DKIM's mandatory payload, the > responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). Other DKIM values > can also be delivered this module; however this additional activity > is outside the scope of the DKIM signature specification. > > Replace "Other DKIM values" to "Other information". My logic: what the assessor consumes beyond the SDID is outside the scope of the spec. Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
