Hi Florian, At 12:03 25-03-2009, Florian Sager wrote: >According to the mails below the RFC compliant change of content >encoding in MTA-forwarding may break signatures that follow the RFC 4871 >recommendation to include header "Content-Transfer-Encoding" in the >signature. This header should be removed from section 5.5. Recommended >Signature Content (The following header fields SHOULD be included in the >signature ...).
Won't the change in content-transfer-encoding (not the header field) performed by an MTA affect the body part and by extension break the DKIM signature? Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
