J.D. Falk:
> Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Eliot Lear wrote:
> >>> 8. RFC4871 Section 2.11 Identity Assessor
> >>>
> >>> Old:
> >>> The name of the module that consumes DKIM's primary payload, the
> >>> responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). It can optionally
> >>> consume the Agent or User Identifier (AUID) value, if provided to
> >>> the module.
> >>>
> >>> New:
> >>> The name of the module that consumes DKIM's mandatory payload,
> >>> the
> >>> responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). Other DKIM values
> >>> can also be delivered this module; however this additional
> >>> activity
> >>> is outside the scope of the DKIM signature specification.
> >> Replace "Other DKIM values" to "Other information".
> >>
> >> My logic: what the assessor consumes beyond the SDID is outside the
> >> scope of the spec.
> >
> > And add "by" between "delivered" and "this".
> >
> > After that, +1.
>
> +1
+1
Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
