> -----Original Message----- > > "Old" refers to the Errata I-D; "New" is the proffered replacement. > > CAVEAT: > > This last-of-three postings affects the same section of text as the > Assessor > revision posting, but attends to a different issue. I've only just gotten > clarification on what this third item was to be, so here's another apology > for a > bit of confusion. > > Had I remembered all 3 items I would have tried to merge this with the > other > Assessor change, which is what the current note attempts: > > > 8. RFC4871 Section 2.11 Identity Assessor > > > Old: > The name of the module that consumes DKIM's primary payload, the > responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). It can optionally > consume the Agent or User Identifier (AUID) value, if provided to > the module. > > New: > The name of the module that consumes DKIM's mandatory payload, the > responsible Signing Domain Identifier (SDID). The module is > dedicated > to the assessment of the delivered name. Other DKIM (and non-DKIM) > values can also be delivered to this module as well as to a more > general > message evaluation filtering engine. However this additional > activity > is outside the scope of the DKIM signature specification. >
Can you explain why you used "dedicated to the assessment of the delivered name" rather than "... of the delivered identifier"? I can live with it either way, but it seems strange to say that it consumes an identifier but assesses a name. Aside from that, it looks fine to me. Ellen _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
