Regarding the "errata" draft, two points: 1. On the content, we hashed out a few things that needed tweaking, and Dave has already posted about these. The response looks good. We'll look at a final tally on Friday, 3 April, and ask Dave to push out a new draft then.
Please do not discuss this point on this message thread; use Dave's three threads for it instead. 2. On the process, after discussion with Pasi on the matter, there was an overwhelming consensus in the room to move forward by processing the "errata" draft as an RFC (with a change in the title to "update" instead of "errata"). Pasi has agreed to expedite the handling, so it should get to the RFC editor quickly. We need to confirm that on the mailing list, and in this case, silence will be taken as consent. If there are no objections, it looks like the 3 April draft will be that final version. Please post any objections or process discussions to this thread. I'll send a separate note about ADSP. Barry -- Barry Leiba, DKIM working group chair ([email protected]) http://internetmessagingtechnology.org/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
