It's time for us to figure out whether we should request a session at IETF 75 in Stockholm. Stephen and I will both be there, so that's not a limiting factor.
We should have all the current documents except for "deployment" with the IESG or RFC Editor by then, and we're not likely to need face-to-face time to discuss the deployment document. That leaves the discussion of next steps: 4871bis work. Is the group ready to move ahead with that? Is the DKIM signing protocol ready to go to Draft Standard? Is there an update needed, with another cycle at Proposed Standard? Is there energy in the group to follow a 4871bis effort through? I will post a seed message for a thread to discuss that; please post 4871bis discussion to that thread. Please use this thread for any other comments or discussion on meeting in Stockholm. Barry (as chair) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
