>> l: Body length count >Despite the warnings we've posted about it, at least one site has >contributed patches to our implementation that extends its basic utility. >That means there's at least a little demand for its use.
Any idea what they're doing with it? Having added some support for DKIM to majordomo2, I am more convinced than ever that the motivation for l=, list recipients will filter list mail using the contributor's signature rather than the list signature, is just wrong. If I may pile on, let me reiterate Dave's point about q=. In the unlikely event that we invent another way to look for key records, that's the time to design the syntax to specify it. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
