Steve Atkins wrote:
> Remember that we're considering the content of the message as
> displayed to the end user here,
No we're not. That has never been in the scope of the DKIM effort.
>>> (though the supposed benefit it offers is not clear)
>> You forgot "to me".
>
> Not really. I don't think the supposed benefit clear to anyone,
> including those who are interested in including the feature.
Speak for yourself, please. And the archives for this -- and
everything else you've brought up -- are your friends.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
