>Surely you do not suppose that a signature which covers only the From >header (and that is a perfectly valis signature according to the >document) is to be accepted as equally valuable to a signature that >covers everything.
Probably not, but that's because a dimwit who puts on cruddy signatures is unlikely to earn a very good reputation. I really REALLY do not plan to waste any time inventing heuristics to evaluate the "quality" of a DKIM signature and I doubt anyone else does, either. If you want people to accept your mail, be sure to sign only good mail, and be sure to sign it in a way that bad guys can't fake. R's, John PS: >It is Blatantly Obvious! Some things that are Blatantly Obvious are also Just Plain Wrong. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
