>get_public_key_string: Return the Base64/DER-encoded PKCS1 >representation of the public key. (the DER form)
>get_public_key_x509_string: Return the Base64/DER-encoded >representation of the "subject public key", suitable for use in X509 >certificates. (the PEM form) I did an experiment. I use the openssl command to make my keys. Normally it makes PEM public keys which it emits in base64 encoded form, but I told it to make in in DER form. It produces DER keys in binary, so I base64 encoded it and put it in the DNS. As I expected, the Mail::DKIM perl package verifies those signatures correctly. This message's signature has a DER verification key so see what your verifier thinks. Even though either form works, it's probably worth a defect report to say that PEM format is the one to use just in case someone uses a library that cares about the difference. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
