d=

Franck Martin wrote:
> someone should tell yahoo then ;)
> 
> What would you use then?
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave CROCKER" <[email protected]>
> To: "Franck Martin" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, 26 May, 2009 8:27:59 AM GMT +12:00 New Zealand
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector
> 
> Using the selector as input to a reputation process is a serious 
> mistake.  It is
> discussed briefly in the Overview, which was just approved by the IESG:
> 
>     <http://dkim.org/specs/draft-ietf-dkim-overview-11.html#rfc.section.4.3>
> 
> Basing assessment on a value that includes the selector destroys the 
> ability to
> use the selector for key management.
> 
> d/
> 
> Franck Martin wrote:
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > I see some ESP are using the selector to do domain reputation. We used
>  > to have a reputation based on the IP, but with DKIM based reputation, it
>  > is more difficult to have a granular reputation, therefore the use of
>  > the selector to differentiate emails.
>  >
>  > Is the use of the selector for this purpose codified somewhere?
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
>    Dave Crocker
>    Brandenburg InternetWorking
>    bbiw.net

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to