On May 25, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Franck Martin wrote: > Not really convenient. > > It would mean a domain name for each class of emails (eg corporate > email, newsletter to customers) > > I'm not sure why using the selector would be a bad idea, if a key > gets revoked the reputation falls to zero, and when a receiver sees > a new key then it may assume no reputation and will build a new one > based on traffic. I think this does no hinder key management.
If changing a selector will damage delivery rates (by trashing the reputation of the sender) then ESPs will never change selectors, and hence keys. You don't get much more of a hindrance to key management than that. Cheers, Steve > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave CROCKER" <[email protected]> > To: "Franck Martin" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, 26 May, 2009 9:50:14 AM GMT +12:00 New Zealand > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] On the Selector > > d= > > Franck Martin wrote: > > someone should tell yahoo then ;) > > > > What would you use then? > > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
