----- "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well you define the 2 difficulties: > > 1) Development costs of implementing a UI > > ... in an open source / freely available app like squirrelmail? > > ... as a 3rd party toolbar or extension for tbird / outlook? > > ... as a PART of outlook? > > ... as a part of the AOL client, or the hotmail / gmail / outblaze web UI? > > Cost varies a lot, doesnt it?
None of the RFCs have trivial costs to implement > > > 2) Relationship with the sender > > > 2) if properly DKIM validated then there would be no need to define an out > > of band relationship with the sended. DKIM with a special protocol should > > be > > Oh? So a spammer publishes some random stuff in a dkim record and I'm > supposed to believe it? Or c1t1b4nk.com publishes a dkim record with > a list unsubscribe and I'm supposed to do just what with it? Well would you have allowed the email to reach the inbox in the first instance?
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
