Tony Hansen wrote:
> However, if no one has deployed with l= signatures, then it can be
> safely removed *because* no one is using it.
>
> But if *anyone* is signing with it, then it cannot be safely removed as
> part of moving to Draft Standard. Then such a change would require
> recycling back at Proposed Standard.
>
Cisco does. I'm pretty sure that the sendmail milter has the ability to
also, so who
knows how many people use it.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
