Folks,
In: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q2/011959.html> Steve Atkins posted a list of suggested DKIM features to drop. This note is intended to anchor a discussion thread for discusses one of those features, namely: > DKIM-Signature Header tags > > x: Signature expiration > > Expiration is a fairly common feature in signing specifications. But > DK and DKIM are different in that the public key is not distributed to > others, it's always under the control of the signer. Does this add > anything that removing the DNS TXT record doesn't do? Is it used? Is > it necessary? Please discuss arguments for and against dropping this. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
