Eliot Lear wrote: > It's not a list. Dave got it wrong. Please look at RFC 4871:
I did, indeed. > The basic question is simply this: is it sufficient to list the key > algorithm in the header? I don't see a plausible attack, so I'm okay +1 > with that. But let's at least have the debate based on facts. yup. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
