Pasi sent the message below out, and I thought this group would like to see it.
We "win" by a wide margin, it seems. Go, team! Well, as Pasi says, "I'm not sure what conclusions can be drawn from this," but "perhaps someone finds these interesting." Barry (as chair, and for what it's worth) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:02 AM Subject: [secdir] Email statistics for SEC WGs To: [email protected] FYI: Here's some data about how active the WG mailing lists in security area have been in 2009. I'm not sure what conclusions can be drawn from this -- different WGs are in different phases of their work, have different number of work items, and communication styles are different. But perhaps someone finds these interesting... Emails on WG mailing list from 2009-01-01 to 2009-07-21 (some spam excluded manually when it would have had a big effect on the numbers): WG messages/month ========= ============== dkim 240 ipsecme 139 sasl 103 pkix 88 krb-wg 83 isms 82 tls 65 hokey 47 keyprov 36 smime 25 emu 23 kitten 15 syslog 11 nea 7 btns 4 ltans 2 msec 1 ============== total 971 Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
