Scott Kitterman wrote: > If advancing DKIM/ADSP along the standards heirarchy is all that's on the > table, I think it should wait. > > Effective rollout of DKIM in large hetrgenous organizations is complex and > takes time. I think it's better to pause for a while and give broad > operational experience more of a chance to exercise what has just been > standardized.
When we last discussed this, and certainly at the Stockholm meeting, there did seem to be consensus for moving 4871 along to DS. If other folks want to wait they should speak up, but for now, I think we do have WG consensus to do that. Stephen. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
