Franck Martin wrote: > Huh? > > My point was to simply ask does dkim help (directly or indirectly) to solve > any problem related to SPAM? Where is the pudding and where is the proof?
A fine question, but the thread Barry started is discussing the proposed WG charter modification, so for now, I'm just trying to understand if you're proposing something for that, (and if so, if you're volunteering to do work:-) If your question is unrelated to the charter discussion, that's fine too. Cheers, S. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephen Farrell" <[email protected]> > To: "Franck Martin" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], "IETF DKIM WG" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, 5 October, 2009 9:36:38 PM GMT +12:00 Fiji > Subject: gathering data (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal) > > > Franck, > > Franck Martin wrote: >> Seems to me something is missing: gather data to establish if DKIM >> specifications have in any way alleviated any misuse of the email system, in >> particular but not limited to spam, phishing attacks and fraud. >> > > If you want to propose some specific work items for the WG > then please do so as proposed charter text. > > However, I've not really seen much interest or energy for > such work so if you're suggesting something, would it be > safe to assume you're willing to work on it yourself? In > that case, submitting a draft-martin-dkim-foo I-D would > be a good place to start so's we'd have an idea of what > kind of gathering you envisage. > > Stephen. > > > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
