Doug Otis wrote: > On 10/7/09 1:36 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: >> On the other hand, I'd see nothing wrong if someone should want to >> write a draft about mailing-list considerations, and propose it as a >> working group item. But I'd want to see it as a draft that we can >> review, not just as a few ideas in an email message. > > A third-party authorization/policy mechanism will not alter the base > DKIM specification. I will be happy to clean up the old tpa draft for > something at which to throw darts.
Why bother? These were never was a "few ideas in email messages" but real drafts over the last few years. There has been server write ups DRAFT on mailing list considerations. There is nothing new here and Barry has shown where he stands before and once again. As long as Crocker and Levine don't believe in Policy, never did and never will, it "ain't going anywhere" and Barry, no one, can't change that unfortunately. It is what it is. In Other words, if not even RFC 5617 (ADSP) can be supported by its author and the main "test bed" mailing list, mipassoc.org DOES NOT RESPECT RFC 5617, then whats the point? -- hls _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
