On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:45:21 +1200 (FJT) Franck Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > >----- "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Except that the ADSP RFC is already published and so it is what it is. >> It is definitely >> premature to crack ADSP open again (of course I thought that about >> DKIM too). >> >But as ADSP states, that the problem of 3rd party signing is not covered, and it seems the issue of mailing lists, then an addendum can be done. > The rough consensus of the group resulted in the ADSP we have now. These issues were discussed before and until there's some reason to believe the rough consensus has shifted, I think it's not the best use of my time.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
