Ian Eiloart wrote: > As an admin, I'd like to be able to reject mail for lacking a DKIM > signature. Without a supporting ADSP, I risk the ire of my users. With a > supporting ADSP, I can point the finger at the publisher of the policy.
That's (more or less) the exact receive-side use case we were discussing when developing ADSP. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
