[email protected] wrote: > In theory, a spammer could forge them, since none of them (not even > spf-discuss!!) use SPF.
I see in our SPF Mail Summary Reports that you are one of the top posters. :) > Loosely, you could say that dkim=except-mlist is equivalent to dkim=unknown > when the validator is a big ISP, and equivalent to dkim=all when the > validator is a vanity domain. > > But you don't need to be a vanity domain to *advertise* except-mlist, and > us vanity domains would appreciate it if you do. If you could Package this and provide it as a persistent protocol methodology for everyone to follow, then GO WEST!! -- _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
