Tony, Ellen, Phillip, Dave and others, I've finally done my AD review for draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-09 (and yes, it took a bit longer than it should have...). I have couple of minor comments (below), but I've asked the secretariat to start IETF Last Call, so you can consider these as the first last call comments:
- IMHO much of the intended target audience is going to find Section 2 very heavy reading. I don't have any concrete suggestions on how to make it easier to understand, however -- so perhaps leaving it as is is OK. - I had big difficulties in understanding Table 1. Probably some rewording/additional explanation would be beneficial here... - Section 10 (Acknowledgements): "TBD"? - Section A.1.1.1: In DomainKeys, the g= field is required to match the address in "From:"/"Sender:" -- while in DKIM, it's required to match i= (which might be totally unrelated to anything in "From:"/"Sender:"). Although this doesn't necessarily cause any actions when migrating from DK to DKIM, perhaps it should be still mentioned? - RFC 2119 isn't listed in the References. Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
