Huh. We should change that then, it's out of date. Franck Martin wrote: > http://postmaster.aol.com/Postmaster.DKIM.html > > Interesting to see they plan to use i= for reputation. I'm now > starting to see this trend on the big mail providers... > > * How are you using DKIM options like i=, d=, or z=? > o We will use d= to establish the reputation of your domain. > Future plans include using portions of i= as the basis in assessing > reputation for sub-domains. > * What should the signer do to make AOL's use of the signature more > helpful? > o Use d= as your primary domain. Use i= to separate your > mail into distinct classes of reputation. > > Example: Your Bank sends marketing mail and transactional bank statements. > > * d=yourbank.com > * i=statements.yourbank.com and i=marketing.yourbank.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html >
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
