Stephen and I apologize for having let this slip since the last IETF meeting, but we're ready to get back to the discussion of rechartering.
Specifically, we would like to present the list of points discussed so far, at least as I've managed to distill them (and so if I've missed your favourite, it was not on purpose, so assume nothing from that and tell me about the omission). We've had lots of discussion in September and October, and I don't want to revisit that. What I want to do here is take a poll. Please look at the following list, and respond to this thread (please do not change the subject, so the votes stay in one thread). In your response, say which items, by number, you would like to see included in a new charter, and which items, by number, you would oppose having in a new charter. (In the case that we choose item 10, go dormant, we wouldn't actually put that in a charter, but vote on it as if we would.) Please do NOT include discussion of any of the items. If you need to clarify your vote, include a VERY BRIEF comment to that effect. If you see a need to have any more discussion of these items at this time, post a new message to the mailing list, starting a new thread. We'll collect the votes over the next two weeks, and report back here with results after the close on 5 Feb. The list, as I've been able to distill it out of the lengthy discussions: 1. Advance DKIM base to Draft Standard 2. 3rd-party authorization label: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label/ If you have not read this draft, please do; we'd like to get a good sense of whether to work on this. 3. Other 3rd-party signing issues (New protocol? Info doc?) 4. Mailing list cohabitation ("dkim=except-mlist") 5. Other mailing list issues (info doc) 6. Specifying ADSP/forwarder guidelines for re-signing (is this different from mailing list issues?) 7. Collect data on deployment and effectiveness of DKIM base 8. Collect data on deployment and effectiveness of ADSP, and consider future of ADSP 9. Update overview and deployment/operations documents (info), as new data are collected. 10. Go dormant for a while, and revisit these questions in 8 to 12 months. Let the polling begin. Barry (and Stephen), as chairs _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
