+1
[email protected] wrote: > We still have couple of unprocessed errata for RFC 4871 left. > Let's try to handle an easy one first: > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1385 > > To me it looks like Section 3.6.2.2 does already specify the > necessary details: > > Strings in a TXT RR MUST be concatenated together before use with no > intervening whitespace. TXT RRs MUST be unique for a particular > selector name; that is, if there are multiple records in an RRset, > the results are undefined. > > Thus, the errata appears unnecessary. Unless I hear objections within > a week or so, I'll mark this as "Rejected" (with a note pointing to > Section 3.6.2.2) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
