I'm missing a bit of context on this. What's the impact on DKIM? -Jim
Dave CROCKER wrote: > Folks, > > The technical details of RFC1652bis must cite MIME AND SMTP, of course. > However > it happens that the details do not absolutlely need to cite RFC5322. > > However it strikes me as too strange to have a standard that pertains to > message > objects not cite the /message/ standard. > > I'd like to have RFC5322 cited at the time MIME is cited, as Ned suggested > privately: > > > In > particular, a significant portion of the Internet community wishes to > exchange messages in which the content body consists of a MIME > message [RFC2045][RFC2046][RFC 5322] containing arbitrary octet-aligned > material. > > > Does anyone object? > > d/ > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
