On 3/11/2010 9:28 AM, Ellen Siegel wrote: > I agree with Dave that that the existing document is already pretty > clear on this positioning, but I can live with this addition.
I don't see any harm in the addition. I also don't see any benefit. For a change like this to be the total result of a Discuss -- other than the delay and extra email traffic -- should bother folks. But this won't be the first unnecessary change to an RFC that was made to keep an AD happy rather than to improve the document. So I can live with it. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
