[email protected] wrote: > Jim Fenton wrote: > > Hmm -- back in IETF73 we seemed to agree (at least according to the > email below) that guessing is, while probably not a good idea, > possibly less bad than the alternative: > > http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q4/010820.html >
Hmm, that's right; I had forgotten completely about that. However, errata 1532 still shows up as "reported"; that means it still needs to be acted on, right? I'm still not entirely clear on the process for errata. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
