> For those of you thinking about statistics regarding DKIM, have I missed any > that might be useful to the working group?
Some ideas (some may be a duplicate from your list): - number of all message signed by this milter - number of all messages checked for signatures - number of messages containing any signature (valid or not) - number of messages containing a valid author domain signature - number of messages containing a valid third-party signature - number of messages coming from a mailing list containing any signature but not any valid signature - number of messages NOT coming from a mailing list containing any signature but not any valid signature Distinguishing broken signatures in direct mail vs mailing list mail provides much better indication of the quality of signatures. A mailing list recognition may be just a good estimate, like checking for presence of any of: Precedence: list List-Id:... List-Post:... List-Unsubscribe:... Mailing-List:... From matching /^...@]+-(request|bounces|owner)/ or /^owner-...@]+/ Mark _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
