>> I sign all my outgoing mail, and I have a feedback loop set up with >> Yahoo, which being very modern and advanced keys on signatures, not IP >> addresses. A few days ago I sent some messages to one of the Freebsd >> mailing lists. Today some Yahoo user who subscribes to that list hit >> the spam button. Freebsd's list software (Mailman, I think) doesn't >> sign, and doesn't strip any headers. So what happened? Yahoo saw my >> signature and sent the reports to me, which was of course useless >> since I don't run the list. > > Would this still be an issue if the lists were signing the outbound mail? > You'd hope that Yahoo would then send the feedback reports to the list owner.
Probably not. It depends if the list owner has an FBL of their own, which small senders generally don't. > If that's the case, then the preferred behaviour must be to sign the message, > DKIM header included. The list should certainly sign, but the old signature has to go, since the reputation of a list's mail belongs to the list, not the contributors. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
