MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > I think we are having the wrong discussion. The real question is: > > "What are appropriate practices for mailing lists in handling DKIM > signed mail?" > > By focusing on John and his single example we are looking at a tree and > not the forest. This may not be the best way to extrapolate recommended > best practices.
I agree except for one thing: mailing list traffic doesn't even make it to .02% for the 20-80 rule. The proper thing is to ignore pleas for outlier turd polishing. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
