On Apr 23, 2010, at 12:56 PM, John Levine wrote: >> John, can you simply clarify the rules/logic of your FBL with Yahoo!? >> That will clarify this scenario considerably. > > It's just like the IP based FBLs that other mail systems have, only > keyed on DK or DKIM d= signing domains rather than IP addresses. I > tell them what my d= domains are, they send reports when recipients > complain. I expect Paypal has the same arrangement with them. If you > don't, you should.
First off, thank you for clarifying this John. As for PayPal, we have a different relationship with Yahoo! that better addresses our needs: https://www.thepaypalblog.com/2007/10/yahoo-paypal-an/ Our motivation is consumer protection. > > The terms of service are pretty typical, I can't redistribute the FBL > reports since they're unredacted, and I can use them for " (a) > reducing the incidences of your legitimate email being filtered by > Yahoo!'s spam filtering system or being marked as "spam" by Yahoo! > Mail users and (b) enforcing your spam policies." > > You can see the TOS here: > > http://feedbackloop.yahoo.net/tos.php > Granted, this is a nice service for monitoring recipient behavior vis-a-vis the spam button, thus helping you enforce your spam policies. I'm sure we do something similar, but that's not my department nor where I think DKIM really flexes it's muscle. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
