On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/29/2010 10:23 AM, Al Iverson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, McDowell, Brett<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:11 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> Your proposal that MLM remove Signatures would cause restrictive >>>>> policies to fail. >>> >>> Which is why I oppose this proposal. >> >> As John Levine mentioned previously, your own posts to this list fail >> authentication and end up in many of our spam folders because of >> Paypal's SPF policy. I'm not against strong authentication policies -- >> but I'm wondering how you personally expect to be able to post to >> mailing lists without acceptance of this proposal? The status quo >> interferes with your ability currently, and broader adoption of >> authentication on the receiving side will only make it worse. > > The solution to a misconfigured SPF/ADSP record is for every receiver to > patch it up post-hoc?
I did not say that. > That makes absolutely no sense. Your apparent anger makes it hard to have a reasonable discussion. Regards, Al Iverson _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
