--On 30 April 2010 06:00:50 -0700 Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 4/30/2010 3:16 AM, Ian Eiloart wrote: > >>> 2) One possible recommendation to list managers is that if a message > to > >>> the list is DKIM signed AND has an ADSP discardable policy AND the > >>> signature cannot be maintained intact then the list should bounce the > >>> message. > >> > >> What is the particular benefit of doing this, rather than letting the > >> receiving site do the bouncing? This is extra mechanism for the MLM, > >> and most MLMs won't be supporting it. I'm trying to get a clear > sense > >> of the value proposition for this. > > > > The receiving site would bounce to the list. > > As John has reminded us, this is not about a bounce message. Rather, it > concerns an independent report, sent to an independently-registered > address. I was responding to the question quoted. I guess it's tangential to the original question that started the thread. > >> Certainly *my* MTA/MLM setup (Exim/Mailman) can be configured to do this. >> In fact, Exim could be configured to do this with any MLM behind it. > > What are the procedures for having this configuration cause FBL reports > go to an address that is different from the one registered in the FBL? > d/ -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
