On Apr 30, 2010, at 2:31 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> Even with your discardable adsp setting, it becomes a >>> matter of the order of checks at the receiver's gate (eg, whitelist >> first, then adsp...) >> >> But since mailbox providers already manage reputation at scale, how much >> of a burden is adding this bit to the mix? Remember this only affects >> mailbox providers who have decided to do DKIM blocking based on ADSP >> discardable policies (for some, if not all senders). > > You appear to be asking recipients to distinguish among legit directly > sent paypal transaction mail, legit paypal mail that comes through > known-to-be-real mailing lists, and any other paypal mail that is > presumably illegitimate.
Nope. I'm suggesting a means for enabling DKIM authenticated mail to survive transit through a mail list and arrive with the intent/purpose/value of the original authentication might be for MLM's to validate incoming mail and DKIM sign their own outbound mail along with the appropriate A-R data. That's all. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
