While I personally find F2F usage sort of creepy, from the receiver's standpoint it looks for all intents and purposes like a mailing list, which for all intents and purposes looks like an unsigned piece of mail purporting to be from my domain. Intent seems to have very little to do with this... so maybe these all just fold into the same unsolved case.
Any other cases of out-of-sender's control of "legitimate" mail purporting to be from their domain? Mike MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER >> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 12:49 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] besides mailing lists... >> >> >> >> On 4/30/2010 9:37 AM, Jeff Macdonald wrote: >>> ESPs have a "forward-to-a-friend" feature for their clients. Its a >>> feature in which the ESPs creates the content and sends a message > from >>> a friend, to a friend. It would be discarded. However, I'm willing > to >>> say this is a bogus practice. >> >> F2F is a well-established and helpful feature. That some uses of > receive- >> side >> authentication cannot cope with it is a limitation of the > authentication- >> based >> service, not a flaw in F2F. >> >> d/ >> >> -- >> > > And it is easy enough to do "F2F" in a manner that does not break the > authentication-based service. > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
