--On 4 May 2010 15:48:01 +0000 John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> And indeed, this might be the (or, at least, an) answer to the >> concern (except of course for ADSP assertions made too broadly >> because it can't cover this scenario. > > I have to say that ADSP is having just the pernicious effect that I > feared it would. Its actual utility is very, very narrow, people want > it to do other things, so they start insisting that the rest of the > world redesign itself to match their concept of ADSP. We seem to have > learned nothing from the experience with SPF. Actually, I'm finding SPF quite useful. Rejecting spf fails, spam scoring on softfails, and limiting the exposure caused by whitelisting. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
