I respectfully disagree with you. We *were* a special case. Soon we will not be a special case because ADSP will enable all mailbox providers, if they choose, to do for others what they have historically done for us. That's the big win that only ADSP could ever enable.
Apparently such an announcement is going to come as a surprise to many of you on this list, but it shouldn't. It's the logical conclusion of the ADSP work. -- Brett On May 26, 2010, at 11:55 AM, John Levine wrote: >> Problem = phishing >> Utility = just one sender + two mailbox providers have blocked over >> 100 million phishing attacks, many of those blocks also resulted in >> site take-downs. > >> The value of what we already have from your efforts in IETF is HUGE > for consumer protection. > > I believe this is a big win for DKIM, which I hope we can tell the world > about. > > It has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with ADSP, since the two mailbox > providers are (quite reasonably) treating paypal and ebay as a special > case. > >> It could be even more useful with the kind of tweaks I've suggested >> for MLM's... and probably a few more flags/states for ADSP. > > We've gone around enough times why this would be bad for Paypal and > bad for everyone else, so I'll stop now. > > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
