----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Levine" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, 3 June, 2010 3:44:59 AM > Subject: [ietf-dkim] My discardable statistics
> I've been saving the DKIM signatures on mail sent to my inbox for > about the past year, so I did a little analysis on them. There's a > total of 71,000 signed messages that got to the procmail delivery > filter, signed by a total of 474 domains. I went through and looked > up the ADSP records for all of them. I found 51 ADSP records: > > It appears that undp.org really is a branch of the United Nations, and > their mail management isn't very good. All four of those messages > came from the UNDP's mail servers, all four of them had return > addresses that appear to be individual users at undp.org, and all four > of them are spam or phish, presumably from botted PCs. Two of the > DKIM signatures verify, two don't, haven't looked hard enough to tell > why not, but they were broken when they arrived at my MTA. (Look at > the spamassassin lines, added at SMTP time.) > > They're all in my spam archive, so you can look at them yourself: > Most UNDP country offices around the world are linked via VPN back to New York where their mail is processed, if I recall correctly. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
