On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:27 PM, J.D. Falk <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > Also: have we beaten the recent ADSP arguments into the ground, or is there > something we could accomplish in person that we didn't on the list? > > I have yet to re-read Doug's latest draft, but I believe that the concept of tying 3rd party signatures to 1st party signatures needs to be explored now. I'm even at the point where I wished the DKIM draft had an explicate rule that forbid the concept of a 1st party signature (where d= is the same as RFC5322From domain). -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
