On Thursday, July 22, 2010, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > > There are three applicable responses: [...] > > Held for document update: The item is correct, but it is not > immediately critical, and may be incorporated in the next revision of > the document.
Barry, I don't think your description is quite correct. "Held for update" is also used for something which is too big or too controversial for "verified". It doesn't have to be correct. But of course it is not obviously incorrect either. Alexey _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
