On 08/03/2010 02:13 PM, [email protected] wrote: > When I receive an email from DKIM mailing list, I know that it may contain > messages from Dave Hector John Doug et all but in my mind the from is DKIM > mailing list. The only dkim sig I am interested in is [email protected] > and if I bothered to check adsp for [email protected] I wouldnt waste > time checking any other signatures/adsp assertions from participants as I see > a mailing list as an aggregator.
Again, I am not talking about ADSP. > If I was designing mailing list software I would strip any incoming headers > that made any assertions about the authors, sign the pile with my dkim sig > and forward as designed. I would be asserting that [email protected] is > the author/aggregator not a forwarding service. Trying to have 3rd party in a > hands off transaction assert or check that the authoring party may be who > they say they are and making decisions upon adsp discardable that may or may > not be valid is beyond any sensible solution. > thanks, now back into lurk mode > Trusting the MLM may be possible for you personnly for this particular mailing list, but your choice is not scaleable to the Internet at large. Or is the general consensus that (in the long run) the reputation of the MLM domain is sufficient for the verifier/receiver of MLM distributed mail? I don't read that in the draft. /rolf _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
