> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave CROCKER [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 10:21 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: DKIM IETF WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarifying DKIM (etc.) expectations for > mailing lists in the face of digests > > Yup. But that's why I chose my wording pretty carefully, making a > statement > about likelihood rather than theory...
Hence my ending comment that nobody's actually asked for that yet. I'm just observing that the technology exists to enable it. Also: Didn't we say on the list, if not in the RFC, that signatures inside parts shouldn't be processed? _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
