Dave CROCKER wrote: >> Daniel Black stated: >> >> Recipients are an important aspect of the message flow and an >> attempting to define a benefit to them from DKIM is an element of >> what I'm attempting to define.
> That's clear. It's also beyond the skillset of this group. It's also > not required for DKIM to be useful. Can you provide information or evidence that exhibits DKIM usefulness and how is the usefulness accomplished? What augmented technology, method or skillset is required in order to get the usefulness you see? If this a future usefulness scope or is it something we can use today? I ask because I am still looking for a payoff and justification to support and add it to our mail software and what components within the framework. I am having a hard time seeing DKIM usefulness. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
