>I'm trying to get the same goal by recommending adding some non-artisicly >specified form of a "list: mlm.example" display so its more evident to the >user without percentage hacks.
I must be missing something. What does this have to do with DKIM? If this were important, why don't MUAs look for the already standard List-ID header, regardless of whether it's signed? In my experience, nearly all of the mail that makes it through existing spam filters and has a List-ID header is really from a list. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
