Mark Delany wrote: >> Steve Atkins: >> I don't see how DKIM can provide the obverse - the obvious way >> is for a sender to assert that all their mail has a DKIM signature, >> but that fails when the DKIM signature breaks in transit. Is there >> a clever trick I'm missing? > > So you're saying it can provide the obverse; you just don't like the > failure modes. Perhaps surprisingly, the failure modes are exactly > what attracts some folk to DKIM.
+1 -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
