"John Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>It's not clear to me that there's consensus that anything qualifies as Best >>Current. We have some small samples of a few things that some people have >>tried, but I don't sense we're there yet. > >I hope that lists signing their outbound mail qualifies. Large >providers Googlegroups and Yahoogroups do it, small providers >including MAAWG and myself also do. > >Beyond that, you're right, we're at best guessing and at worst pulling >stuff out of our whatevers. > Which brings us back to the question of the value of the DKIM working group writing an RFC that suggests people should sign mail. I don't think it has much. I think an experimental document that amounts to something like "We've thought about this a lot and discussed it and collectively we've got NFC yet what's best yet. Here are some ideas ..." is what's most needed. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
