Ian Eiloart wrote: >> However, this can be potentially be a high overhead/management for >> large companies with many employees using different list servers. > > Too true, and I don't think that this kind of delegation would be any > kind of a solution for the ADSP=discardable/MLM problem. It might be > used as a work around for small vanity domains, but wouldn't scale. > Plus, I'm not sure that it would be a great workaround, as it kind of > says "if you want to spoof my email address, here's a list of MLM > servers that might accept my email and apply a convincing signature for > you!"
Agree, it does expose your "friends," but wouldn't you be first party protected on the submission (assuming the MLM is ADSP compliant and why one would put it in their ASL)? -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
